OXFORD CLIMATE SOCIETY
  • About
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • Our History
    • Advisory Board
    • Our Sponsors
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Videos of Past Events
  • Education
    • The Oxford School of Climate Change
    • Capstone Projects
    • Climate Change and Policy Lecture series
    • COP information
    • Climate Library
  • Action
    • Sustainability Action Guide
    • Decarbonise Oxford
    • College Sustainability Workshops
    • Legacy Campaigns >
      • Sustainability in the Curriculum
      • Oxford Climate Action Plan
  • Media and Arts
    • RISE zine
    • Anthroposphere: The Oxford Climate Review
    • Interdiscplinary Fine Art
  • Blog
    • Articles >
      • International Climate Policy
      • Global Perspectives
      • What you need to know about...
      • Past Blogs
    • Event summaries
  • Get Involved
    • Join Our Teams
    • RISE Submissions
    • Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • Alumni Network
  • Contact
  • Donate

Past Blogs

A variety of blog posts

Should we care about plastic straws?Individual vs systemic action event summary

26/1/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
( Kirsty O'Connor/PA )
What is the appropriate level of action to fight climate change? Individual, or systemic? This subject of fierce debate was discussed at our event last Monday "Should we really care about plastic straws?".
The speakers Dr Tina Fawcett and Dr Thomas Hale acknowledged the argument for some that focusing on individual action represents not only a complete waste of time, but also a danger: 
  1. The “Mississippi syndrome”: if you focus on the little boats going upstream, you may lose sight of the big polluting boats that keep going downstream.
  2. It may come with a form of “purity test”: “you can’t be a good person if you don’t do X Y or Z”. As a consequence, this may disqualify some people from working towards a systemic change, just because of some feature of their personal behaviour (e.g. flying for their holidays).
  3. We don’t all have the same needs. The plastic straw is a good example of a thing we should not blindly demand the disappearance of: some people do need them (e.g. due to some disability). We shouldn’t go too fast saying “nobody needs what I don’t need”.
Both of the speakers, however, refuse this binary way to frame the debate – as if you couldn’t both act for systemic change and change your individual behaviour. In particular, they underline the following advantages of undertaking individual action:
  1. It helps you being credible when you talk. When a speaker calls for change but flies and eats meat, it may do a lot of harm. Conversely, making changes to your lifestyle that are consistent with your ideology makes your demand for systemic change much more persuasive.
  2. The main sources of emissions in the UK are transport, food, accommodation- things which ultimately connect with our everyday life. Thus, there is an unavoidable connection between the individual and the systemic changes we call for.
  3. It contributes to change the social norm.
  4. It makes you more knowledgeable, about what the best things to be done. Thus, Dr. Fawcett mentions that a lot of her research is about house renovation; renovating her own house helped her to identify further elements to be taken into account.
  5. It also makes you feel empowered: however huge the crisis may be, at least you’re doing your best to act against it.
But how? How can individual actions participate to a more systemic change? Dr. Hale enumerates at least four mechanisms:
  1. Consumer power: what we buy, don’t buy… NB: To be an effective customer, however, you obviously need money. Therefore, although an effective tool, it is not available to everyone.
  2. Employee power. We’re not only consumers: we work, and we can 1) try to choose our company/institution in accordance with our values, plus 2) try to act from within our company/institution to make it change its behaviour.
  3. Normative action. According to Dr. Hale, slavery ended because the social norm evolved. How do you enact this change? By talking, and by reinforcing the message with concrete actions that lend it moral credibility. However, whatever the degree of commitment of the person you’re talking with, it is crucial to first listen to the person and their values. People coming from very different normative backgrounds may feel concerned with the climate crisis, (e.g. conservatives may be particularly concerned with the preservation of their neighbourhood). Dr. Fawcett mentions the work of the organisation Climate Outreach (https://climateoutreach.org/).
  4. Political engagement. Pressuring parties is one of our most effective ways, because they control the policies and that’s what going to make the biggest change. There is in the UK a consensus through the parties about the climate crisis, which is not common. There is room then to talk to everyone and try to get all parties to fulfil their commitments – Dr. Fawcett mentions the project “Talking to the centre-right”. 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    OCS Media Team

    The latest in climate science, policy, perspectives and more from the OCS team.

    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    May 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017

    Categories

    All
    Adaptation
    BEIS
    Climate Justice
    Communication
    COP23
    COP24
    COP26
    Coronavirus
    DEFRA
    Eco Guide
    Economics
    Event Summary
    Extreme Weather
    Food
    Food Reviews
    Fossil Fuels
    Gender
    Global Perspectives
    Government
    Impacts
    International
    Local
    Nature
    Oceans
    Plastic
    Policy
    Pollution
    Race
    Solutions
    UK
    UNFCCC
    USA
    Women And Climate Change

    RSS Feed

Developing informed climate leaders
www.oxfordclimatesociety.com
  • About
    • What We Do
    • Who We Are
    • Our History
    • Advisory Board
    • Our Sponsors
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Videos of Past Events
  • Education
    • The Oxford School of Climate Change
    • Capstone Projects
    • Climate Change and Policy Lecture series
    • COP information
    • Climate Library
  • Action
    • Sustainability Action Guide
    • Decarbonise Oxford
    • College Sustainability Workshops
    • Legacy Campaigns >
      • Sustainability in the Curriculum
      • Oxford Climate Action Plan
  • Media and Arts
    • RISE zine
    • Anthroposphere: The Oxford Climate Review
    • Interdiscplinary Fine Art
  • Blog
    • Articles >
      • International Climate Policy
      • Global Perspectives
      • What you need to know about...
      • Past Blogs
    • Event summaries
  • Get Involved
    • Join Our Teams
    • RISE Submissions
    • Subscribe to our Newsletter
  • Alumni Network
  • Contact
  • Donate